The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd,for exactly the same reason,so is the idea that tigers have rights.However,this is only one account,and by no means an uncontested one.exactly如何翻译for exactly the same reason又如何

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/05/15 07:10:55
The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd,for exactly the same reason,so is the idea that tigers have rights.However,this is only one account,and by no means an uncontested one.exactly如何翻译for exactly the same reason又如何

The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd,for exactly the same reason,so is the idea that tigers have rights.However,this is only one account,and by no means an uncontested one.exactly如何翻译for exactly the same reason又如何
The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd,for exactly the same reason,so is the idea that tigers have rights.However,this is only one account,and by no means an uncontested one.
exactly如何翻译
for exactly the same reason又如何翻译?

The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd,for exactly the same reason,so is the idea that tigers have rights.However,this is only one account,and by no means an uncontested one.exactly如何翻译for exactly the same reason又如何
对一只吃人的老虎进行处罚的思想是十分荒谬的,非常相似的道理,老虎有自己的权力也是如此.然而,这仅仅是一个特例,并非毫无疑义的.
【言外之意】:
老虎的天性是肉食动物,吃了人就要受到惩罚,那我们人类大量捕杀其他动物,破坏生态平衡,是否也应该受到其他动物的惩罚呢?当然,人与其他动物的“权力”并非完全一样.
exactly 强调两个列举事件之间相似程度的密切性.
exactly 极其相似的;同样地
for exactly the same reason 极其相似的道理,但是不完全相同.

老虎吃人应受到惩罚的观点是荒谬的,使用同样恰当的理由分析,老虎也有自己的权力。但是,这仅仅是一方面,而且绝对不会有没有争议的观点

exactly 同样的, 一模一样的
for exactly the same reason 正因为同样的原因
因老虎吃了人而惩罚老虎荒唐可笑;正因为同样的原因,认为老虎有权利也荒唐可笑。然而, 这只是一种(对人权的)认识. 这种认识绝非没有争议.