美国经济大萧条的简述,要全英版的.讲一下原因、过程及结果.好的话我把剩下的分全给!

美国经济大萧条的简述,要全英版的.讲一下原因、过程及结果.好的话我把剩下的分全给!
美国经济大萧条的简述,要全英版的.讲一下原因、过程及结果.
好的话我把剩下的分全给!

美国经济大萧条的简述,要全英版的.讲一下原因、过程及结果.好的话我把剩下的分全给!
原因就是经济危机,为什么经济危机呢,当然是大家口袋里没有钱,而生产出来的商品又太多,于是成为恶性循环,企业越来越没利润,于是大家手里的工资越来越少,最后索性被炒了鱿鱼,再然后,就是社会动荡不安.
而为什么生产出来的太多?就是因为当时刚蒙受到电力等的新能源的优点,生产成本大幅降低,生产效率极度膨胀；而为什么大家又没钱?和这个也有关系,越来越多的工作不需要人工,而且企业家为了追求更高利润不愿意加工资,所以一方面是热火朝天的生产,一方面是工人不断下岗,在岗的也没有加工资.
这是一个原因：电力等新能源新技术带来生产能力的极度膨胀与工资的不涨反降,另一个原因就是城市化,大批农民没了土地被赶到城市,当时的土地政策为了鼓励投资,为了获取更高的地租,所以土地拥有者希望卖给企业,或者卖给房地产的,而不愿意给农民承包种地.所以象中国这样的国家短期不会出现类似问题,就是因为我们的土地大部分还是用于农业,被城市化的比例不高,可以满足大部分人口的自给自足,不至于引发大的社会动荡.
美国可不一样,因为美国的土地可用于耕种的其实很少,而且美国农民不象中国农民这样的吃苦耐劳,可以开梯田可以开荒山,大家都被城市化的美好号召叫进城里.
还有一个原因,就是当时的社保几乎没有,这属于政府原因.
在目前中国的大城市其实也有类似的问题,只不过没有变成全面性的现象,在新的经济模式没有成熟前,旧的不要轻易丢弃,目前中国也处在经济转轨期,从劳动力密集向技术密集转变,所以慢慢地变化是对的,要软着陆,一个时期内多种经济形式并存,而不要大家一窝蜂做一个模式.前苏联的经济改革也是这种病因,农村经济基本上破产了,可城市经济又没有多么成熟.
对于经济危机的解决,罗斯福新政就做了两点：干涉经济、开发社保.也可以说是比较接近问题的根源了,这个新政没有走回头路,没有再次让大家回去种地,是一种冒险,而且冒险成功了.当然他的成功还有很重要的原因是二战.
The reason is that the economic crisis, and why the economic crisis, of course, is our pocket, no money, and the commodities produced too much, so a vicious cycle, corporate profits is less and less, so the wages of the hands of fewer and fewer people, and finally simply was fired, and then, is social unrest.
Produced too much and why? Mongolia had just been because of new energy and power advantages of significantly lower production costs, production efficiency greatly inflated; and why do we have money? And this relationship is also an increasing number of job does not require labor, and entrepreneurs in pursuit of higher profits do not want more money, so one is in full swing production, one is constantly laid-off workers, no increase in the post's wages.
This is one reason: power and other new technologies bring new energy production capacity greatly inflated wages not up and down, the other reason is urbanization, a large number of farmers without land to be rushed to the city, when the land policy to encourage investment , in order to obtain a higher rent, so the land owners want to sell the business, or sell real estate, but do not want to farmers contracting the land. Therefore, countries like China do not appear similar to the short-term problem, because most of our land is still used for agriculture, urbanization ratio is not high, to meet the majority of the population of self-sufficiency, and will not lead to great social unrest.
Like the United States from time because the United States of land available for farming in fact very small, and the United States as the Chinese peasant farmers do not like the hard, barren mountains can open terrace can be opened, we have been called the city of town where the beautiful call.
Another reason is that almost no social security at the time, which belongs to the government cause.
In fact, China's major cities have similar problems, but did not become a comprehensive phenomenon, in the new economic model is not mature before, do not easily discard the old, the current period of economic transition in China from a labor-intensive to changes in technology-intensive, it is slowly changing, and to a soft landing, a period of coexistence of various economic forms, and not everyone rush to make a pattern. Economic reform in the former Soviet Union is such a cause, the rural economy is basically bankrupt, how can the urban economy has not matured.
Solution for the economic crisis, the New Deal to do two things: interference economy, development of social security. Can also be said to be relatively close to the root of the problem, and the New Deal did not go back, never again to let everyone go back to farming, is an adventure, and adventure a success. Of course, there are very important to his success is due to World War II.